Concept by Joseph Myers, built on Peace Parks' public data. Not an official Peace Parks product.

Power BI version

Built in Power BI

This page mirrors a 4-page Power BI report built on the same data model.

The .pbix file is available on request.

Screenshot of the PeaceParks-Concept report in the Power BI service, Page 1, Published numbers
Page 1, Published numbers
Screenshot of the PeaceParks-Concept report in the Power BI service, Page 2, Fire detections
Page 2, Fire detections
Screenshot of the PeaceParks-Concept report in the Power BI service, Page 3, Rainfall
Page 3, Rainfall
Screenshot of the PeaceParks-Concept report in the Power BI service, Page 4, How it was built
Page 4, How it was built

Page 1 · From Peace Parks’ Annual Reviews and public map layers

Peace Parks’ published numbers

Every figure links to its page

Strategy 2030 layer: 11 features as drawn

May not be the same 11 as the 2030 target; the reviews don't list them.

DR CONGOTANZANIAANGOLAZAMBIAMALAWIMOZAMBIQUEZIMBABWENAMIBIABOTSWANASOUTH AFRICANiassa-Selous EcosystemMalawi-Zambia TFCALower Zambezi-Mana Pools TFCAKavango Zambezi TFCAIona-Skeleton Coast TPChimanimani TFCAGreater Mapungubwe TFCAGreat Limpopo TFCAKgalagadi TP/Ai/Ais-Richtersveld TPLubombo TFCRAMaloti-Drakensberg TFCAABCDEFGHIJKN0250500 kmtrue at 20.6°S

Strategy 2030 feature TFCA (transfrontier conservation area) conceptual linkage

Malawi - Zambia TFCA

  1. A Nyika (Malawi)
  2. B Vwaza Marsh Wildlife Reserve

Lower Zambezi-Mana Pools TFCA

  1. C Greater Mana Pools Ecosystem Proposed

Kavango Zambezi TFCA

  1. D Sioma Ngwezi Management Complex CMA Signed 2024
  2. E Simalaha

Great Limpopo TP

  1. F Zinave
  2. G Banhine
  3. H Limpopo

Lubombo TFCRA

  1. I Maputo
  2. J Ndumo
  3. K Tembe Elephant Park

Status shown only where the layer stores one. Not a legal boundary map. Source: Peace Parks' public ArcGIS layers, accessed 2026-10-07. Country outlines: Natural Earth.

Land managed or co-managed, as published

Shown as printed, with 'over' kept.

The target and the bigger picture

All from Annual Review 2025. The 2050 vision is there for context.

Animals moved since inception, as published

Each year's review, as published. Wording differs by year.

Each review counts differently; don't subtract one year from another.

2022 p.20

17,806

animals relocated by Peace Parks

2023 p.5

18,167

animals of 27 unique species relocated

2024 p.47

18,170

animals translocated since inception

2025 p.5

18,602

game animals from 27 species reintroduced

Animals moved in the year

2019 p.4

1,060

animals

2021 p.5

468

animals

2022 p.24

601

animals (11 species)

2020, 2023–2025: no annual total published

Illegal wildlife traps confiscated

73,821

As reported in Annual Review 2025

AR2025 p.5

Illegal firearms confiscated

1,394

As reported in Annual Review 2025

AR2025 p.5

Income vs operating expenses, R'000

Group, Statement of Financial Performance. 2022 = continuing operations.

Income Operating expenses

2022432,258415,4312023369,184337,1222024426,472388,5422025513,926504,056

Sources: AR2022 p.64 · AR2023 p.29 · AR2024 p.84 · AR2025 p.57

2025: two income figures, both published

Starts in 2022: the group boundary changed that year (colleges deconsolidated). 'Income' is the Statement of Financial Performance line; Total Income adds other and finance income.

Concept by Joseph Myers, built on Peace Parks' public data. Not an official Peace Parks product. · Page 1 of 4 · sources accessed 2026-10-07

Page 2 · Satellite data you can add

Fire detections by park

Jan 2020 – Dec 2024

Banhine logged more satellite fire detections than any of the other three parks, 2020–2024. Planned burning, wildfire, or both? Field records would answer that.

2020–2024 detections: Banhine 15,331 · Zinave 7,392 · Limpopo 6,811 · Maputo 1,107 (gap months included).

Monthly fire detections inside each park

Each bar = one month's count of NASA satellite fire detections inside the park, Jan 2020 – Dec 2024. Taller bar = more detections that month.

month month with a possible satellite data gap · same scale in all four charts · a detection is not a fire

Limpopo NP

05001,0001,5002,000Detections per month2020202120222023202401,0002,000Detections per month20202021202220232024

Banhine NP

05001,0001,5002,000Detections per month2020202120222023202401,0002,000Detections per month20202021202220232024

Zinave NP

05001,0001,5002,000Detections per month2020202120222023202401,0002,000Detections per month20202021202220232024

Maputo NP

05001,0001,5002,000Detections per month2020202120222023202401,0002,000Detections per month20202021202220232024
Show the numbers

Limpopo National Park

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
20201101510251220
202100000072131701,2102
20221000100*120*19486470
20231000141093631,628444027
2024001100*0*1*2291,8530*5

Banhine National Park

Zinave National Park

Maputo National Park

JanFebMarAprMayJunJulAugSepOctNovDec
202077817233425037610291
202110093531283537600
2022330200145*31*4701333
20232400152171221462100
2024309007*2*36*234110*74

Detections per month, all confidence levels. * month with a possible satellite data gap. Each value links to its NASA FIRMS VIIRS S-NPP Mozambique yearly file, accessed 2026-10-07.

Read this first
Fire detections are not fires. Each one is a hot 375 m pixel seen by one NASA satellite at overpass. One fire can give many detections, and cloud or smoke can hide a fire.source
Month = UTC date. A few night detections on the 1st of a month fall in the previous month.source
Includes 111 detections FIRMS flags as type 3 (offshore/water), mostly in Banhine.source

2020 is low in Limpopo, Banhine and Zinave in two independent NASA satellite records: VIIRS S-NPP (shown) and MODIS Collection 6.1 both put 2020 at 2–13% of the 2021–24 yearly average, while Mozambique-wide detections in 2020 were normal. This is what the satellites recorded, not a gap in the data; the cause is not known from these data.

Maputo NP counts are small, and the two satellite records disagree on 2020; read Maputo's year-to-year changes with care.

Months with a possible satellite gap (grey)

MonthDays with no detections, Mozambique
Jul 20225source
Aug 202210source
May 20242source
Jun 20243source
Jul 202411source
Nov 20243source

Source: NASA FIRMS VIIRS S-NPP yearly country files (accessed 2026-10-07) · park outlines: Peace Parks' published layer

Concept by Joseph Myers, built on Peace Parks' public data. Not an official Peace Parks product. · Page 2 of 4 · sources accessed 2026-10-07

Page 3 · Satellite data you can add

Rainfall by park

Jan 2020 – Dec 2024

Monthly rainfall inside each park, mm

Each bar = one month's rainfall in the park (mm); the dark line = that month's 1991–2020 average. Above the line = wetter than average.

month's rainfall 1991–2020 average for that month · same scale in all four charts · Jan 2020 – Dec 2024

Limpopo NP

0100200300400500mm per month202020212022202320240200400mm per month20202021202220232024

Banhine NP

0100200300400500mm per month202020212022202320240200400mm per month20202021202220232024

Zinave NP

0100200300400500mm per month202020212022202320240200400mm per month20202021202220232024

Maputo NP

0100200300400500mm per month202020212022202320240200400mm per month20202021202220232024
Show the numbers

Limpopo National Park

Banhine National Park

Zinave National Park

Maputo National Park

Rainfall in mm. Each value links to its CHIRPS v2.0 Africa monthly file, accessed 2026-10-07.

Read this first
Rainfall is a modelled satellite-plus-gauge estimate (CHIRPS), not a rain gauge in the park. The park value is the simple average of the 0.05° cells whose centre lies inside the park.source
"Normal" means the 1991–2020 average for that park and month, from the same product. The difference is shown in mm.source
Park outlines are Peace Parks' own published ArcGIS layer, not gazetted legal boundaries. No park areas are printed. Maputo's outline is the land part only.source

Difference from average

Difference (mm) = month's rainfall − 1991-2020 average for that park and month.

Hover any month to see it, worked out, for that park. No percentage anomaly is shown: in dry months a few mm would look like a huge swing.

The charts stop at Dec 2024 to match the fire page.

Source: CHIRPS v2.0 Africa monthly, Climate Hazards Center, UCSB (accessed 2026-10-07)

Concept by Joseph Myers, built on Peace Parks' public data. Not an official Peace Parks product. · Page 3 of 4 · sources accessed 2026-10-07

Page 4 · Process and accuracy

How this was built and checked

  1. Step 01 Public sources Annual Reviews, peaceparks.org, public ArcGIS layers, NASA FIRMS, CHIRPS.
  2. Step 02 Extraction Every figure taken with its exact sentence and PDF page.
  3. Step 03 Re-derivation A second, independent pass recomputed a sample of figures from the raw files.
  4. Step 04 Sceptical review A sceptical reviewer hunted for anything a data manager would question.
  5. Step 05 Clean tables One row per fact, with its source link and access date.
  6. Step 06 Report This report. Every number links back to its source.

The accuracy scorecard

Every value is sourced; 99 re-derived independently, 99 matched.

  • Published numbers page: 29
  • Fire and rainfall pages: 528
  • Same item, two published values (this page): 13 more
  • Sourced values in charts, tiles and tables: 570
  • Independently re-derived: 99 individually (29 published numbers + 13 same-item values + 57 satellite values), plus all 240 fire months in aggregate
  • Matched: 99 of 99 (and 20 of 20 park-year fire totals)
  • Values corrected: 0
  • 31 presentation fixes before release

Full check log available on request.

What a single source of truth catches

Some are different definitions or re-presentations; for others the documents don't say why. Both values, both links.

  1. 1 Animals reintroduced, 2025 · different date and wording

    18,602 AR2025 p.5 · 18,500 CEO end-of-year post, 2025-12-15

  2. 2 Animals translocated in 2019 · post dated 19 Dec 2019; counts moves 'to these two protected areas'

    1,060 AR2019 p.4 · 1,047 news post, 2019-12-19

  3. 3 2030 co-managed area target · target figure changed by 100 km²

    83,946 km² AR2024 p.5 · nearly 83,846 km² AR2025 p.3

  4. 4 Five priority landscapes · three published sizes

    675,990 km² AR2023 p.5 · 680,000 km² AR2024 p.5 · 675,000 km² AR2025 p.3

  5. 5 Strategy 2030 key protected areas; Vision landscapes · count updated between editions

    10 key protected areas AR2022 p.5 · 18 landscapes AR2023 p.13 · 17 landscapes AR2024 p.5 · 11 key protected areas AR2025 p.4

  6. 6 Income, 2025 (definition) · two definitions, reconciles exactly (not an error)

    513,926 income line AR2025 p.57 · 566,484 Total Income AR2025 p.63

  7. 7 2021 finance, re-presented · re-presented after deconsolidation (not an error)

    371,763 income line AR2021 p.89 · 360,489 operating expenses AR2021 p.89 · 305,006 income (2021 re-presented) AR2022 p.64 · 255,156 operating expenses (2021 re-presented) AR2022 p.64

How AI was used

AI was used to raise accuracy, not to generate numbers. An AI pass read every annual-review page and pulled each figure with its exact sentence and page. A second pass independently recomputed a sample of figures from the raw files without seeing the first. A third pass played a sceptical Peace Parks data manager and hunted for anything he would question. Every number here comes from a named public file. No number here is estimated by us; the rainfall series is CHC's modelled product. The right datasets matter most; AI helps read them carefully.

Separating fewer incidents from less reporting

In May 2025, the number of reported elephant incidents had dropped to 31 – down from 85 for January 2022.

“Either there are fewer incidents, or the intensity of reporting is dropping.”

Peace Parks team, Maputo National Park (news post, 31 July 2025)

Recording how each report came in, and the effort behind it, would help tell those two apart.

What we deliberately did not show

  • No rhino, ranger, patrol or collar locations. No rhino moves at all, no fire points (monthly counts only), no patrol areas and no ranger numbers.
  • No personal data. ArcGIS editor usernames and editor notes were dropped. Officials' names were trimmed from quotes. No staff names.
  • No forecasts, projections or trend lines into the future. No "at this rate". No % progress toward targets. No computed % changes (the one exception is the 2020 satellite cross-check note on the fire page). No annual moves derived by subtracting cumulative totals.
  • No modelled estimates presented as facts. The wildlife estimate and climate projections are not in this report.
Concept by Joseph Myers, built on Peace Parks' public data. Not an official Peace Parks product. · Page 4 of 4 · sources accessed 2026-10-07